Original Post
So I was recently discussing this on Socal3G, and I just want to get things cleared up.
Have we, or have we not, found that the 1999/2000 ECUs can be flashed? I am getting mixed answers, and the thread on Club3G is getting huge. The information is also scattered all over the place. Last I remember, Acamus just needed a file from anyone with a 99 ECU and he would be able to work something out for us?
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
As of right now, I would really like to avoid having to swap to a 02-03 M/T ECU from an Eclipse. That would require repinning and all that nonsense. In the future, I could probably complete this swap, as well as a full wire tuck, but that won't be for a LONG while when I don't need my car for an extended period of time.
Basically I need tuning capabilities so that I can run the stock 6G74 (270s?) injectors instead of the 6G72 (220s?) injectors.
This top post can be edited for any information that comes up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Useful Information (as of March 20th, 2011)
For the following rom/def files, visit this thread: : You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login 1999 Fed Spec/2000 6g72
Diamante VRX (6g74)
2000 4g64
For basic EcuFlash/tuning information, visit this thread:
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginFor older versions of EcuFlash, visit the EvoScan website:
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginTo order your Tactrix 2.0 cable, visit the Tactrix website:
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginFor free logging software, download Mitsulogger:
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginFor $25 (but much better) logging software, download EvoScan
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginFor a free XML editor (much better than using notepad), visit editix.com:
-> You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Sunday 4/7/11, 2:53 am
I have attached the 1999 V6 Cali spec ROM, as well as the most up-to-date definition file (20410017) thanks to Jamie and "Thane" from over on openecu.org. I read the ROM using a read-template that I created, which is actually very very simple. I will post that as well, because some people seem to be getting confused by the fact that you have to read under the "Evo" name. So put this read template in the read templates folder, and you'll have the option to choose "1999-2000" Galant.
Can anyone verify that the Galant memory model is H8539F or H8539FA? I believe it to be only the F, but I'm not completely sure. Anyway, the read template is set up for to read a H8539F.
I also attached the Fed Spec ROM and definition files (20430016)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Wednesday 5/4/11
Good news! We are so close to getting a working definition going. Check page 5, You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginThe new 20410017 definition is the most up-to-date definition, with most things working besides the RPM and Load axis. Thanks to Isaurio and Marty over on openecu for the hard work. I moved around some tables just cause they were bugging me with the way they were layed out in EcuFlash, so if you want to edit a definition, edit this one.. unless you don't care where the tables are

Update Saturday 5/7/11
My definition is finally done thanks to Isaurio!! I am updating the file that I posted here so that it is the most current definition (20410017). The only thing is that EcuFlash will not let me edit most of the injector latencies, which I'm pretty sure I need to do for the 6G74 injectors. Also looking at some stock 6G72 Eclipse GT ROMs, their injector latencies appear to be almost double that on my 1999 ROM (3.xxx milliseconds in is the highest on mine, 6.xxx on the Eclipse)
Sunday 5/8/11
Well, turns out it was just the scaling used during the calculation of injector latency that was wrong. This changed the values to match that of the Eclipse's, and also allows me to now edit the values.. for some reason. Also, the values are supposed to show up color coded based on magnitude of value (almost like a rainbow of ranging values). With the old scaling, they were all showing up the same color.. which is not right.
Wednesday 7/27/11
I attached the 20410017 and 20430016 definitions again, this time with the correct MAF scaling and smoothing tables. For more info on how to fix these tables in your pre-existing definition (any definition), go to the EcuFlash thread and view my post from 7/26/11. I also fixed the Injector Latency table for the 20430016 definition.